Stimulator for treatment of back pain utilizing feedback

ABSTRACT

Apparatus and methods for treating back pain are provided, in which an implantable stimulator is configured to communicate with an external control system, the implantable stimulator providing a neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy designed to cause muscle contraction to rehabilitate the muscle, restore neural drive and restore spinal stability; the implantable stimulator further including one or more of a number of additional therapeutic modalities, including a module that provides analgesic stimulation; a module that monitors muscle performance and adjusts the muscle stimulation regime; and/or a module that provides longer term pain relief by selectively and repeatedly ablating nerve fibers. In an alternative embodiment, a standalone implantable effRF ablation system is described.

I. REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/339,957, filed Mar. 11, 2010.

II. FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This application relates to apparatus and methods for treating back pain by combining circuitry for providing neuro-muscular electrical stimulation (NMES) therapy with circuitry for providing analgesic stimulation, performance monitoring and feedback, and/or selective ablation.

III. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The human back is a complicated structure including bones, muscles, ligaments, tendons, nerves and other structures. The spinal column consists of interleaved vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs. These joints are capable of motion in several planes including flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, longitudinal axial distraction-compression, anterior-posterior sagittal translation, and left-right horizontal translation. The spine provides connection points for a complex collection of muscles that are subject to both voluntary and involuntary control.

Muscles provide mechanical stability to the spinal column. Cross sectional images of the spine demonstrate that the total area of the cross sections of the muscles surrounding the spinal column is much larger than the spinal column itself. Additionally, the muscles have much larger lever arms than those of the intervertebral disc and ligaments. The motor control system sends signals down nerves to activate the muscles of the back in concert to maintain spine stability.

The multifidus is the largest and most medial of the lumbar back muscles. It consists of a repeating series of fascicles which stem from the laminae and spinous processes of the vertebrae, and exhibit a substantially similar pattern of attachments caudally. These fascicles are arranged in five overlapping groups such that each of the five lumbar vertebrae gives rise to one of these groups. At each segmental level, a fascicle arises from the base and caudolateral edge of the spinous process, and several fascicles arise, by way of a common tendon, from the caudal tip of the spinous process. Although confluent with one another at their origin, the fascicles in each group diverge caudally to assume separate attachments to the mamillary processes, the iliac crest, and the sacrum. Some of the deep fibers of the fascicles which attach to the mamillary processes attach to the capsules of the facet joints next to the mamillary processes. All the fasicles arriving from the spinous process of a given vertebra are innervated by the medial branch of the dorsal ramus that issues from below that vertebra.

Normally, load transmission in the spinal column is painless, with the muscles acting in concert with the ligaments and bones preventing excessive relative movements of the structures. The neutral zone is the range of intervertebral motion, measured from a neutral position, within which the spinal motion is produced with a minimal internal resistance. Over time, dysfunction of the spinal stabilization system can lead to instability and abnormal movement of the spine, resulting in overloading of structures when the spine moves beyond its neutral zone. High loads can lead to inflammation, disc degeneration, ligament damage, facet joint degeneration, and muscle fatigue, all of which can result in pain.

For patients believed to have back pain due to instability, clinicians first offer a group of therapies that attempts to minimize the abnormal range of motion that leads to the pain. If this group of therapies does not work, then the next group of therapies aims to block the pain produced by the abnormal range of motion.

Common conservative methods of attempting to reduce abnormal motion aim to improve muscle strength and control and include core abdominal exercises, use of a stability ball, and Pilates. If conservative methods of preventing abnormal movement are ineffective, surgical approaches may be used.

Spinal fusion is the standard surgical treatment for chronic back pain. One or more vertebrae are surgically fused together to prevent relative motion. Following fusion, motion is reduced across the vertebral motion segment. Dynamic stabilization implants are intended to reduce abnormal motion and load transmission of a spinal motion segment, without fusion. Total disc replacement and artificial nucleus prostheses also aim to improve spine stability and load transmission while preserving motion.

If pain persists after physical therapy or surgical intervention to prevent the abnormal motion that leads to pain, few options are available for relief.

One option is a technique referred to as “RF rhizotomy”, in which radio frequency (“RF”) energy is used to ablate the medial branch of the dorsal ramus that contains the afferent fibers responsible for transmitting pain signals from the facet joint. There are several devices available for performing this treatment, such as those offered by Baylis Medical Inc. (Montreal, Canada). While this technique can be effective, it provides only short term relief as nerve fibers may regenerate over time, and generally the procedure must be repeated approximately every six months to maintain effective pain control. The electrical parameters for RF ablation of nerves differ amongst various suppliers.

Another option for pain relief is Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS). This technology provides low energy electrical signals delivered via externally applied skin pad electrodes. While the exact mechanism of action is still subject to some controversy, it is generally believed that the electrical energy blocks the signals in the afferent nerve fibers that transmit the pain signals to the brain.

A modification to this approach is to use percutaneous wires connected to electrodes placed nearer to the nerves (PENS or Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation). A wide variety of PENS or TENS stimulation parameters have been published, including high-frequency (HF; >10 Hz), low-frequency (LF; <10 Hz), variable-frequency (VF) and acupuncture-like (AL), which employs very low-frequency, high-amplitude stimulation. The intensity of the TENS or PENS stimulation (voltage or current) is generally adjusted to a level which achieves analgesia without causing irritation or pain from the stimulation itself. One such PENS device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,671,557.

Implantable devices for electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves for control of pain have been described. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,324,852 B2 describes an implantable electrical stimulation device with a plurality of electrodes that are implanted subcutaneously and are stimulated in a pre-determined pattern to provide pain relief.

A Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS) is an implanted electrical stimulation device with one or more electrodes that are placed adjacent or near to the spinal cord, with the goal of blocking the pain signals from being transmitted via the spinal cord to the brain. Although SCS was originally designed and approved for radicular pain (sciatica), the technique is increasingly being used for lower back pain. Spinal cord stimulators may be self-powered (i.e., contain a primary battery or cell) or may include a rechargeable battery (i.e., a secondary battery or cell), as described for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,516,227.

The key drawback with all of the previously known electrical stimulation techniques that seek to block the pain signals (TENS, PENS, SCS and RF Ablation of the nerves) is that relief, if obtained, is usually only temporary, and repeated or continuous therapies are needed.

U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2008/0228241 to Sachs, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, describes an implanted electrical stimulation device that is designed to restore neural drive and rehabilitate the multifidus muscle. Rather than masking pain signals while the patient's spinal stability potentially undergoes further deterioration, the stimulator system described in that application is designed to reduce the propensity for instability of the spinal column, which in turn is expected to reduce persistent or recurrent pain.

While the stimulator system described in the Sachs application seeks to rehabilitate the multifidus and restore neural drive, it does not provide relief of the pain during the application of the therapy. Thus, it is possible that for some patients the effectiveness of the therapy may be hindered by the continuation of pain, which may interfere with restoration of neural drive to the muscle or impede the patient's ability to tolerate the therapy. In addition, it is possible that as the tone of the multifidus muscle improves during use of the stimulator system described in the Sachs application, it may be desirable to reduce the stimulus amplitude, frequency or duration, or stimulation intervals.

In view of the foregoing, it would be desirable to augment the stimulator system described in the Sachs application with additional therapeutic modalities, such as the ability to alleviate pain during and between muscle stimulation. It therefore may be desirable to provide pain blocking stimulation to afferent nerve fibers simultaneously with muscle stimulation pulses, or at other times.

It further may be desirable, depending upon the severity of the pain experienced by a patient and the degree to which it interferes with rehabilitation of the multifidus muscle, to provide pain blocking by selectively ablating afferent nerve fibers in conjunction with the stimulation therapy described in the Sachs application.

It also would be desirable to combine the rehabilitative stimulation therapy described in Sachs with a capability to monitor muscle performance during the stimulation therapy, and to adjust the applied stimulation pulses to account for changes in the muscle tone and neural drive. In addition, it would be desirable to detect the duration, frequency and strength of muscle contractions to further reduce the patient's perception of pain resulting from the muscle stimulation therapy, for example, to avoid spasm.

IV. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of the drawbacks of previously-known methods and apparatus for treating back pain, the stimulator system of the present invention provides a neuromuscular electrical stimulation system designed to rehabilitate spinal stability and restore neural drive, while providing additional therapeutic modalities, such as the ability to alleviate pain during and between muscle stimulation intervals. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, an implantable neuromuscular electrical stimulation system is provided that includes one or more of a number of additional therapeutic modalities: a module that provided analgesic stimulation; a module that monitors muscle performance and adjusts the muscle stimulation regime; and/or a module that provides longer term pain relief by selectively and if necessary repeatedly ablating afferent nerve fibers.

Accordingly, one embodiment of the stimulator system of the present invention combines circuitry to stimulate and rehabilitate the multifidus muscle with circuitry to stimulate afferent nerves to alleviate back pain during and between muscle stimulation intervals. The analgesic pulse regime may be applied to afferent nerve fibers simultaneously with muscle stimulation pulses, or at other times.

In an alternative embodiment, circuitry to stimulate and rehabilitate the multifidus muscle may be combined with circuitry that achieves pain blocking by selectively and repeatedly ablating afferent nerve fibers.

In still another embodiment, circuitry to stimulate and rehabilitate the multifidus muscle may be combined with circuitry to monitor muscle performance during the stimulation therapy, and to adjust the applied stimulation pulses to account for changes in the muscle tone and neural drive. For example, such performance feedback circuitry may detect the duration, frequency and strength of muscle contractions to further reduce the patient's perception of pain resulting from the muscle stimulation therapy, for example, to avoid spasm.

It should be appreciated that while the foregoing additional modalities are described in the context of a neuromuscular electrical stimulation system, such as described in the foregoing Sachs application, such modules may be packaged separately or in other combinations for applications other than treating back pain. For example, the RF ablation module may be implemented as a standalone implantable system for selectively ablating unresectable tumors located in the liver, brain, thyroid, pancreas, kidney, lung, breast, or other body structures, thereby avoiding the need for repeated reoperations. Alternatively, the RF ablation module may be combined with the analgesic stimulation module, such that the analgesic module provides continual pain relief while the RF ablation module provides intermittent ablation of selected afferent nerve fibers or tissue. As an additional example, the analgesic stimulator module may be combined with the performance feedback module, to provide an implantable stimulator that monitors muscle exertion and may adjust the stimulatory regime applied to the afferent nerves to maintain patient comfort.

The implantable electrical stimulation system of the present invention includes an implantable housing connected to at least one or more electrodes placed in appropriate anatomical locations and connected by leads to the housing. Feedthroughs (preferably hermetically sealed) connect the leads to the internal electronic circuitry. Stimulation electrodes may be logically connected in pairs to a stimulation channel designed to supply the stimulation regime needed for the therapeutic modality chosen for that electrode pair. The stimulator system may be arranged so that a different therapeutic modality may be applied to selected electrode pairs simultaneously. For example, the stimulator may apply neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the medial branch of the dorsal ramus to effect contraction and rehabilitation of the multifidus muscle, while simultaneously applying electrical stimulation to a different arrangement of electrodes placed adjacent to the spinal cord to effect spinal cord stimulation to relieve pain.

In general, the stimulator system includes an implantable housing including a controller, a memory, a power source (e.g., battery or cell), a telemetry system (e.g., transceiver), one or more modules containing therapeutic circuitries (e.g., muscle stimulation, analgesic stimulation, performance feedback or RF ablation) coupled to the electrodes via an electrode switching circuit, and one or more sensors. The controller preferably comprises a processor, nonvolatile memory for storing firmware, implant identification information, and system and environmental data, and volatile memory that serves as a buffer for computations and instructions during execution and firmware updating. The controller preferably is coupled to battery, transceiver, electrode switching circuit, therapeutic module circuitries and sensors to monitor system status and to activate the various therapeutic module circuitries in accordance with the programming stored in the memory. The battery (or cell) can be a primary or secondary (rechargeable) configuration that preferably uses long-lasting lithium chemistry (e.g., lithium-ion or lithium polymer). If rechargeable, the battery is coupled to an inductive charging circuit, thereby enabling the battery to be periodically coupled to an external control system for charging. A radio frequency transceiver preferably is employed in the device for transmitting system information to, and receiving information from, the external control system, including system performance data, logged physiological data, commands, and firmware upgrades.

The stimulator system further comprises an external control system that may be coupled to the stimulator housing to supply power to the power source, to program/reprogram the controller, and to download system parameters and data stored within the memory. The external control system may be configured to transfer energy to the power source via inductive coupling. In a preferred embodiment, the external control system comprises a housing containing a controller, radio transceiver, inductive charging circuit and power source. The controller is coupled to the inductive charging circuit, power source, radio transceiver, and memory for storing information to be transmitted between the external control system and the implantable housing. The external control system may include a data port, such as a USB port or Bluetooth wireless connection, that permits the external control system to be coupled to a conventional computer, such as a personal computer or laptop computer, to configure the stimulation programs input to the stimulator and to review and analyze data received from the stimulator.

The stimulator system further may comprise monitoring and control software, configured to run on a conventional personal computer, laptop computer, “smart phone” or other computational device that enables the patient's physician to configure and monitor operation of the external control system and stimulator. The software may include routines for controlling any of a number of parameters associated with operation of the various therapeutic module circuitries incorporated in the stimulator. The software further may be configured, for example, to send immediate commands to the stimulator to start or stop muscle or analgesic stimulation, to perform RF ablation, or to take a current reading of muscle activity and adjust the stimulation regime(s), or to change the electrodes used to apply stimulation. Finally, the software may be configured to download data collected from the stimulator and stored on the external control system, such as during a patient visit to the physician's office.

Methods of operating the stimulator system of the present invention also are provided. The implantable portion of the stimulator may be placed subcutaneously using interventional radiologic techniques including radiographic imaging or ultrasound, while the electrode leads may be placed using surgical, percutaneous, or minimally invasive techniques. The stimulator preferably is programmed using radio frequency coupling of the transceivers in the stimulator and the external control system, while power is supplied to the battery of the stimulator by coupling the inductive charging circuits of the stimulator and external control system. Additional details of methods of implanting and operating a stimulator system in accordance with the present invention are described below.

V. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an exemplary embodiment of a stimulator system constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a side view of the implantable portion of the stimulator system of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a generalized block diagram of the stimulator of FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a first embodiment of the stimulator of FIG. 3, wherein the stimulator is configured to deliver both neuromuscular stimulation and analgesic stimulation to afferent nerve fibers.

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a second embodiment of the stimulator of FIG. 3 wherein the stimulator is configured to deliver neuromuscular stimulation, monitor the effects of the applied stimulation, and adapt the stimulation regime to improve muscle toning and reduce patient discomfort.

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of an alternative embodiment of the apparatus of the present invention that provides a selective ablation capability.

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a further alternative embodiment of the stimulator of the present invention that includes neuromuscular stimulation, pain reduction, performance feedback and selective nerve ablation capabilities.

FIGS. 8A and 8B are, respectively, a plan view and detailed view of an exemplary electrode constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.

VI. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION System Overview

Referring to FIG. 1, an overview of an exemplary stimulator system constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention is provided. In FIG. 1, components of the system are not depicted to scale on either a relative or absolute basis. Stimulator system 10 comprises implantable stimulator 20 and external control system 30. In the illustrated embodiment, software may be installed and run on a conventional laptop computer, and used by the patient's physician to program external control system 30 and/or to provide programming that is communicated by external control system 30 to stimulator 20. During patient visits, external system 30 may be coupled, either wirelessly or using a cable, to the physician's computer to download for review data stored on stimulator 20, or to adjust the operational parameters of the stimulator.

In FIG. 1 implantable stimulator 20 is connected to a plurality of electrode leads. Illustratively, electrode lead 21 is connected to electrode pair 22, which is situated close to or around a peripheral nerve N where the nerve enters skeletal muscle SM, which may be a multifidus muscle. Electrode pair 22 may deliver neuromuscular electrical stimulation (“NMES”) pulses to nerve N that induce contraction of muscle SM to effect contraction of the muscle, and restoration of neural control and rehabilitation of the muscle, as described in the aforementioned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2008/0228241 to Sachs. Electrode lead 23 is illustratively disposed with electrode pair 24 adjacent or near to peripheral nerve P, such that electrical stimulation may be applied to achieve pain control in the region served by the peripheral nerves. Electrode lead 25 illustratively includes quadripolar electrode array 26, which is placed near spinal cord S in a manner well known to one skilled in the art to deliver Spinal Cord Stimulation therapy that reduces or blocks the transmission of pain signals to the patient's brain B.

Implantable stimulator 20 is controlled by, and optionally powered by, external control system 30, which communicates with stimulator 20 via antenna 31, which may comprise an inductive coil configured to transmit power and communicate information in a bidirectional manner across skin SK. The technology for antenna 31 is well known to one skilled in the art and may include a magnet, a coil of wire, a longer range telemetry system (such as using MICS), or technology similar to a pacemaker programmer. Alternatively, coil 30 may be used to transmit power only, and separate radio frequency transmitters may be provided in external control system 30 and stimulator 20 for establishing directional data communication.

Referring now to FIG. 2, an exemplary embodiment of implantable stimulator 20 coupled to electrode lead 27 is described. As is common with other active implantable medical devices, the stimulator electronics are housed in a hermetically sealed metal housing 28. Housing 28 may comprise titanium or other biocompatible material, and includes connector block 29 that permits allows electrode lead 27 to be electrically coupled to the electronics within housing 28. While only one electrode lead 27 is shown coupled to connector block 29, it should be understood that multiple leads may connected to connector block 29, as shown in FIG. 1. Electrode lead 27 contains a plurality of electrodes 27 a-27 d that may be used for multiple purposes, as described in detail below. The construction of electrode lead, the electrode design and manufacture, and connector block 29 are all well known to those skilled in the art. As will also be understood by one of skill in the art, an electrode lead may contain more or fewer than four electrodes, as described in detail below with respect to FIGS. 8A and 8B.

With respect to FIG. 3, a generalized schematic diagram of the internal functional components of implantable stimulator 20 is now described. Stimulator 20 includes controller 40, telemetry system 41 coupled to antenna 42 (which may be inside or external to the hermetic housing), power supply 43, electrode switching array 44, system sensors 45, and therapeutic circuitry modules 46 and 47. Electrode switching array 44 is selectably coupled to terminal array 48, which is housed in connector block 29 and enables stimulator 20 to be coupled to one or more electrode leads, as shown in FIG. 1.

Controller 40 may comprise a commercially available microcontroller unit including a programmable microprocessor, volatile memory, nonvolatile memory such as EEPROM for storing programming, and nonvolatile storage, e.g., Flash memory, for storing a log of system operational parameters and patient data. Controller 40 is coupled to telemetry system 41 that permits transmission of energy and data between implantable stimulator 20 and external control system 30. Controller 40 also is coupled to therapeutic circuitry modules 46 and 47 that provide any of a number of complimentary therapeutic stimulation, analgesic, feedback or ablation treatment modalities as described in detail below. Controller 40 further may be coupled to electrode switching array 44 so that any set of electrodes of the electrode leads may be selectably coupled to therapeutic circuitry modules 46 and 47. In this way, an appropriate electrode set may be chosen from the entire selection of electrodes implanted in the patient's body to achieve a desired therapeutic effect. Electrode switching array 44 preferably operates at high speed, thereby allowing successive stimulation pulses to be applied to different electrode combinations.

Power supply 43 powers the electrical components of implantable stimulator 20, and may comprise a primary cell or battery, a secondary (rechargeable) cell or battery or a combination of both. Alternatively, power supply 43 may not include a cell or battery, but instead comprise a capacitor that stores energy transmitted through the skin via a Transcutaneous Energy Transmission System (TETs), e.g., by inductive coupling. Stimulator 20 may be programmed and/or controlled by, and may upload stored system and operational data to external control system 30 via telemetry system 41. In a preferred embodiment, power supply 43 comprises a lithium ion battery.

System sensors 45 may comprise one or more sensors that monitor operation of the systems of implantable stimulator 20, and log data relating to system operation as well as system faults, which may be stored in a log for later readout using the external control system. Sensors 45 may include, for example, a humidity sensor to measure moisture within housing 28, which may provide information relating to the state of the electronic components, or a temperature sensor, e.g., for measuring battery temperature during charging to ensure safe operation of the battery. System sensors 45 also may include a 3-axis accelerometer for determining whether the patient is active or asleep and to sense overall activity of the patient, which may be a surrogate measure for clinical parameters (e.g., more activity implies less pain), and/or a heart rate or breathing rate (minute ventilation) monitor, e.g., which may be obtained using one or more of the electrodes disposed on the electrode leads. Data from the system sensors may be logged by controller 40 and stored in nonvolatile memory for later transmission to external controller 30 via telemetry system 41.

If system sensor 45 includes an accelerometer, it may be used to determine the orientation of stimulator 20, and by inference the orientation of the patient, at any time. For example, after implantation, external control system 30 may be used to take a reading from the implant, e.g., when the patient is lying prone, to calibrate the orientation of the accelerometer. If the patient is instructed to lie prone during therapy delivery, then the accelerometer may be programmed to record the orientation of the patient during stimulation, thus providing information on patient compliance.

Implantable stimulator 20 illustratively includes two therapeutic circuitry modules 46 and 47, although more or fewer circuitry modules may be employed in a particular embodiment depending upon its intended application. As described in greater detail below with respect to further embodiments, therapeutic circuitry modules 46 and 47 may be configured to provide different types of stimulation, either to induce muscle contractions or to block pain signals in afferent nerve fibers, to monitor muscle contractions induced by stimulation and vary the applied stimulation regime as needed to obtain a desired result, or to selectively and intermittently ablate nerve fibers to control pain and thereby facilitate muscle rehabilitation As shown in FIG. 3, the therapeutic circuitry modules are coupled to and controlled by controller 40.

Typical stimulation parameters provided for different requirements are summarized below, and will be well known to those skilled in the art:

-   -   For neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES):         -   Bipolar electrode pairs         -   Biphasic rectangular charge balanced         -   0.5-500 ms pulse width (adjustable to control intensity)         -   10-30 Hz (to achieve tetanic contraction)         -   Constant current, <50 mA (<50V)     -   For PENS type stimulation:         -   Multiple bipolar electrode system         -   Biphasic pulses         -   20-40 Hz (including possibility of variable frequency over             time of application of therapy)         -   Constant current (typically 5-20 mA)     -   For Spinal Cord Stimulation:         -   Multiple electrode configurations         -   Biphasic rectangular charge balanced         -   Typically 500 μsec pulse width         -   Current control (preferred) or voltage control, typically up             to 10 mA into a 1KΩ load     -   For Radio Frequency Ablation:         -   450-500 KHz         -   RF heating energy

Embodiments comprising specific combinations of therapeutic circuitry modules in accordance with the principles of the present invention are described below.

Combination Stimulator for Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Pain Relief

Referring now to FIG. 4, a first embodiment of a neuromuscular electrical stimulation is described, which provides both stimulation to improve muscle tone and neural drive, while also providing stimulation to block or reduce transmission of pain along afferent nerve fibers. In the schematic of FIG. 4, implantable stimulator 50 includes controller 51, telemetry system 52 coupled to antenna 53, power supply 54, electrode switching array 55, system sensors 56, and NMES circuitry module 57 and analgesic stimulation circuitry module 58. Electrode switching array 55 is selectably coupled to terminal array 59, which is coupled to the connector block 29 (see FIG. 2) and enables stimulator 50 to be coupled to one or more electrode leads.

Each of components 51 to 59 operates in the manner described above for the embodiment of FIG. 3. More specifically, controller 51 preferably includes a programmable microprocessor, volatile memory, nonvolatile memory, and nonvolatile storage, and is coupled to and controls operation of telemetry system 52, NMES circuitry module 57, analgesic stimulation circuitry module 58, and electrode switching array 55. Power supply 54 powers the electrical components of implantable stimulator 50, and may comprise a primary cell or battery, a secondary cell or battery, a combination of both or neither. In the latter case, power supply 54 may comprise a capacitor that stores energy transmitted through the skin via TETS. Stimulator 50 may be programmed and/or controlled by, and may upload stored system and operational data to external control system 30 via telemetry system 52. System sensors 56 may comprise one or more sensors that monitor operation of stimulator 50, as well as patient parameters, such as movement, heart rate, etc., and may log data relating to these parameters for later readout using the external control system.

In the embodiment of FIG. 4, NMES circuitry module is configured to provide stimulatory pulses to the nerves innervating, or directly to the muscle fiber of, the multifidus or other selected muscle group to cause a predetermined series of muscle contractions in during a predetermined number of sessions to enhance muscle tone and improve neural drive in the muscle, as described in the above published application to Sachs, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2008/0228241, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.

Some patients receiving stimulator 50 may experience back pain due to previous injury and/or loss of muscle tone, while other patients may find the contractions induced by operation of the NMES circuitry to be unpleasant. Accordingly, stimulator 50 further includes analgesic stimulation circuitry module 58 to block or reduce pain associated with the previous injury or muscle contractions induced by the NMES therapy. As depicted in FIG. 1, in one preferred application of stimulator 50 (corresponding to stimulator 20 in FIG. 1), electrode pair 22 is situated on the medial branch of the dorsal ramus to deliver NMES pulses that cause muscle contraction to effect restoration of neural drive to and rehabilitation of the multifidus muscle. Analgesic stimulation circuitry module 58 may simultaneously be coupled to electrode pair 34, via electrode lead 23, and quad electrode 26, via electrode lead 25, to block or reduce pain signals generated in spinal cord S or peripheral nerve P. In addition, electrode pair 22 also may be used, e.g., by controller 51 switching electrode switching array 55 to couple electrode pair 22 to analgesic stimulation circuitry module 58, to deliver higher frequency stimulation to block afferent pain signals. In this manner, it is expected that NMES therapy may be provided while reducing patient discomfort and pain associated with any pre-existing injury.

Stimulator 50 and the electrodes also may be configured such that one set of electrodes is used to simulate the tissues on one side of the body, and another set of electrodes is used to simulate tissues on the other side of the body. In this manner, the stimulator and electrode system can be configured to deliver unilateral or bilateral stimulation, or a combination of electrodes stimulating tissues in no particular geometric arrangement.

Alternatively, a plurality of electrodes may be implanted on or adjacent to the medial branch of the dorsal ramus, such that one pair delivers NMES via circuitry module 57 to effect contraction of the multifidus muscle, and another pair simultaneously or successively delivers higher frequency stimulation via circuitry module 58 to block the pain signals in the afferent fibers. The pairs of electrodes may include one or more common electrodes. The timing of the different electrical stimulation delivered offers several options. For example, the pain blocking stimulation may occur simultaneously with the NMES stimulation, may be multiplexed with the NMES stimulation (i.e., time wise interleaved so that stimulation pulses are not delivered simultaneously on both electrode pairs), in an alternating manner (i.e., NMES then pain blocking and so on), or episodically, such as NMES for a period without pain blocking stimulation, and then pain blocking stimulation when the NMES is not being delivered.

In a preferred embodiment intended for clinical applications, NMES stimulation is applied to the multifidus in sessions, typically one hour per day over a period of a few weeks. Such a regime is similar to conventional strength training by physical exercise which typically follows a similar time course. In preparation for the sessions of NMES strength training, stimulator 50 may be used to apply SCS therapy to block or dampen the pain signals which may arise from the NMES exercise regime. In this way, the desired therapeutic effect of restoration of neural drive and rehabilitation of the multifidus may occur without substantial pain or discomfort. For patients afflicted with severe back or radicular pain, stimulator 50 offers the capability to apply SCS therapy at the same time as NMES rehabilitation therapy for the multifidus.

In one embodiment, the patient may have access to external control system 30, and can thus activate implantable stimulator 50 in accordance with a rehabilitation plan developed jointly with his or her physician. In this case, controller 51 may be programmed to provide a delay of specified duration between activation of the stimulator and initiation of the stimulation pulses. This delay allows the patient to assume a comfortable position before the stimulation is applied, e.g., by lying prone. The external control system also may include a multi-functional user interface, including a range of patient operated inputs (e.g., buttons, knobs, touch screen, etc.) that allows activation or suspension of different types of stimulation.

In another embodiment, implantable stimulator 50 may be programmed to ramp up and ramp down the strength and duration of the stimulation pulses. This can be done in at least one of two manners. In the first manner, the stimulation pulse intensity is increased gradually (e.g., over 0.5 to 1 second) to a programmed maximum value to elicit the desired muscle contraction and then ramped down slowly. In this way, the muscle contraction has a smooth on and off sensation for the patient. In the second manner, the therapeutic dose (i.e., the number of contractions of a therapy period) are programmed to increase gradually until the desired level is achieved and then decrease gradually to zero, in much the same way that a good muscle strength training regime provides a stretching or warm-up phase and cool-down phase. In this mode of operation, stimulator 50, via either input to the external control system or at a pre-determined time, and following the stimulation delay (if any), ramps us the stimulation amplitude from a low level (e.g., beginning at zero) to a pre-determined maximum level over a pre-determined period of time. Likewise, upon conclusion of the stimulation therapy period, stimulator 50 ramps the amplitude down from the pre-determined maximum level to a low level. It is expected that this embodiment, which provides a gradual increase and decrease of stimulation intensity, will provide a more comfortable experience for some patients.

As discussed above, implantable stimulator 50 preferably contains nonvolatile memory for storage, and is programmed to log data during the therapy session, along with internal parameters of the device. Such data logging may also record data from system sensors 56, which may be downloaded from stimulator 50 using the external control system, to provide an indication of the effectiveness of the therapy. For example, if the sensors include a three axis accelerometer, then a patient's overall activity level on an hourly, daily, or weekly basis may be logged, for example, by recording an integral of all accelerometer measurements. The sensors also may include circuitry for determining heart rate, and such circuitry may be used to record the patient's maximum heart rate as a measure of overall activity.

In clinical use, the stimulator 50 is implanted subcutaneously, and system sensors 55 may be used to record and log baseline (i.e., pre-therapy) patient parameters such as total activity and maximum heart rate. The therapy then is enabled, and the data logging may be used to assess progress of the therapy and the patient's change in status. For example, if the accelerometer shows increased overall activity, this would indicate that the pain, which was previously inhibiting activity, had been ameliorated. Such data may be used by the physician to adjust the therapy by adjusting the programming of stimulator 50 using external control system 30, and/or such information may be provided to the patient as encouraging feedback.

Stimulator for Neuromuscular Stimulation with Performance Feedback

Referring now to FIG. 5, another embodiment of a stimulation system constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention is described, in which the implantable stimulator provides a NMES stimulator therapy and further has the capability to monitor the progress of the therapy and to revise the therapy regime to reflect changes in the muscle characteristics resulting from the therapy. Such revision may be made by way of a physician periodically reprogramming the NMES parameters using external control system 30, or alternatively the NMES stimulation parameters may be adjusted dynamically and automatically modified to keep the muscle contraction at a certain predetermined efficacious and tolerable level. In some embodiments, stimulator 60 may provide a closed loop feedback system, in which the system instantaneously responds to physiological changes affecting the stimulation characteristics of the muscle.

Although a primary application of the inventive technology is to improve stability of the spine, it also may be advantageously applied in other areas of muscle rehabilitation, e.g.:

-   -   Restoration of function of leg muscles to allow standing and         walking in paraplegic patients (referred to as Functional         Electrical Stimulation (FES));     -   Rehabilitation of injured or weakened muscles following surgery         or correction of osteoarthritis, such as rehabilitation of the         quadriceps after knee surgery;     -   Restoration of neural drive and rehabilitation of muscles that         are part of the stabilizing system in the back, including the         lumbar multifidus;     -   Providing stimulation to effect breathing (diaphragm and/or         intercostal muscles); and     -   Providing mechanical muscle power to perform a bodily function,         for example, as in cardiomyoplasty.

The implantable NMES stimulator described in the above-incorporated Sachs application discusses that the parameters for electrical stimulation may be programmed into the stimulator following testing by the physician of stimulation thresholds. Therapy parameters such as duration, frequency and strength of contraction also may be programmed into the stimulator according to the patient's needs, and the stage of therapy delivery. In some cases it is expected that the programmed parameters may need to be changed, for example during the course of the therapy program as the muscle becomes rehabilitated.

Stimulator 60 of FIG. 5 is designed to improve the NMES performance and reduce the need for frequent reprogramming by monitoring muscle performance during therapy, and adjusting the stimulation parameters accordingly. More specifically, implantable stimulator 60 includes controller 61, telemetry system 62 coupled to antenna 63, power supply 64, electrode switching array 65, system sensors 66, and NMES circuitry module 67 and muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 68. Electrode switching array 65 is selectably coupled to terminal array 69, which is coupled to the connector block 29 (see FIG. 2) and enables stimulator 60 to be coupled to one or more electrode leads. Electrode switching array 65 also may include connection 69 a to the housing of stimulator 60, so that the housing functions as an electrode.

Each of components 61 to 67 and 69 operates in the manner described above for the embodiment of FIG. 3. Controller 61 preferably includes a programmable microprocessor, volatile memory, nonvolatile memory, and nonvolatile storage, and is coupled to and controls operation of telemetry system 62, NMES circuitry module 67, muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 68, and electrode switching array 65. Power supply 64 powers the electrical components of implantable stimulator 60, and may comprise a primary cell or battery, a secondary cell or battery, a combination of both or neither. In the latter case, power supply 64 may comprise or include a capacitor that stores energy transmitted through the skin via a Transcutaneous Energy Transmission System (“TETS”). Stimulator 60 may be programmed and/or controlled by, and may upload stored system and operational data to external control system 30 via telemetry system 62. System sensors 66 may comprise one or more sensors that monitor operation of stimulator 60, as well as patient parameters, such as movement, heart rate, etc., and may log data relating to these parameters for later readout using the external control system.

In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, stimulator 60 further comprises muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 68 coupled to controller, and designed to monitor one or more parameters of muscle performance. The measured parameters may be used to automatically modify the therapy delivered by NMES circuitry module 67, and/or to provide stored and telemetered information via telemetry system 62 and external control system 30 that enable the physician to modify the parameters. In one preferred embodiment, muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 68 may be coupled through electrode switching array 65 to selected electrodes coupled to terminal array 69 to measure electrical parameters of the tissue, such as impedance, or evoked potential from the stimulation. Circuitry module 68 may in addition be coupled to system sensor 66, for example, to obtain data from an accelerometer or other movement transducer, and/or temperature or pressure. Circuitry module 68 also may be configured to receive inputs from other types of body sensors such as are known in the art, including those monitoring chemical properties (e.g., pH sensor, etc.). Circuitry module 68 preferably includes at least one listening amplifier configured for electromyography (EMG). EMG is an electrical signal produced by muscle when it contracts, and the strength (power) of the EMG is an indicator of strength of muscle contraction. Configuration of an amplifier for measurement of EMG, e.g., gain, frequency response, impedance, etc., is well known to those skilled in the art. As described in Stokes, Ian A F, Sharon M Henry, and Richard M Single, “Surface EMG electrodes do not accurately record from lumbar multifidus muscles,” Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 18, no. 1 (January 2003): 9-13, it is known that certain muscles, such as the deep fibers of the lumbar multifidus, surface EMG provides an unreliable signal. Accordingly, the implantable electrode leads used with stimulator 60 advantageously are expected to provide a useful EMG signal.

In another embodiment, circuitry modules 67 and 68 may be configured to perform impedance measurements, in a manner similar to that described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,406,421 B1 to Grandjean et al. As is well known, an electrical impedance measurement may be performed by injecting a current through one pair of electrodes, and measuring voltage through a different pair of electrodes disposed approximately along the same geometric path. See, e.g., Rutkove, S. B., “Electrical impedance myography: Background, current state, and future directions”, Muscle & Nerve 40, No. 6 (December 2009): 936-46. In one implementation, a first pair of electrodes consisting of the stimulator housing (via connection 69 a) and one or more of electrodes disposed on an electrode lead may be used to inject current into the tissue (e.g., from NMES circuitry module 67), while voltage is measured by circuitry module between the stimulator housing and a different set of one or more of electrodes on the electrode leads. Alternatively, the same set of electrodes (including the stimulator housing) may be used for both injecting current and measuring the resulting voltage.

The foregoing impedance measurements may be of direct current (DC) or alternating current (AC). With AC impedance measurement, additional useful information may be obtained such as phase, frequency spectrum, and changes in parameters. The electrical impedance so measured is an indication of the tissue volume and tissue organization (anisotropy) between the measurement electrodes, as reported in Garmirian et al., “Discriminating neurogenic from myopathic disease via measurement of muscle anisotropy”, Muscle Nerve, 2009 January; 39 (1): 16-24. See also, Miyatani, M., et al., “Validity of estimating limb muscle volume by bioelectrical impedance”, J. Applied Physio. (Bethesda, Md. 1985) 91, no. 1 (July 2001): 386-94. Accordingly, judicious placement of the electrodes and the stimulator housing will ensure that only the tissue of interest (e.g., the target muscle) is in the path of the injected and measured voltage. As a muscle contracts, its dimensions change, and this will generate a change in electrical impedance. Thus, measurement of electrical impedance may be used as a surrogate measure of muscle contraction.

In another embodiment, circuitry module 68 may include or be coupled to a transducer that senses mechanical motion, such as vibration, acceleration or deflection, and may include piezoelectric polymers (e.g., PVDF) placed on a lead. The signal from such a transducer provides a surrogate measure of muscle contraction. In a further alternative embodiment, circuitry module 68 may include or be coupled to a transducer that senses pressure, such as a MEMS pressure sensors disposed on a lead, and which thus provides a surrogate measure of muscle contraction.

In yet another embodiment, stimulator 60 is configured to sense EMG from more than one muscle, using multiple electrode leads or multiple electrodes on a single lead that passes through more than one muscle. In this case, the listening amplifier of circuitry module 68 is multiplexed to listen for EMGs from more than one muscle. Alternatively, circuitry module 68 may include multiple listening amplifiers that are arranged to simultaneously listen to EMGs from more than one muscle. It is well-known, for example from Jaap van Dieen et al., “Trunk Muscle Recruitment Patterns,” Spine Vol. 28, Number 8 pg 834-841, that the relative timing and amplitude of EMGs in trunk muscles during the performance of specific tasks is different between healthy individuals and patients experiencing low back pain due to spinal instability. In patients with spinal instability, recruitment patterns of the trunk muscles may be altered to compensate for the lack of spinal stability. The amplitude and timing of EMGs measured from multiple trunk muscles therefore may be used to diagnose the presence and degree of spinal instability, as well as the change of spinal instability during a course of therapy. The EMG data may be used to automatically modify treatment parameters, or such data may be stored for later review by the physician to assist in diagnosis and revision of the therapy parameters.

In the embodiment of FIG. 5, muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 68 is configured to measure muscle contraction induced by NMES circuitry module 67, and to modify the therapeutic parameters as muscle performance changes. In particular, the initial therapeutic parameters, such as dose and duration of therapy session, are established and programmed into stimulator 60 using external control system 30. Between therapy sessions, muscle performance may be monitored continuously or periodically using circuitry module 68. When the change in measured muscle performance exceeds a predetermined physician selected threshold, circuitry module 68 may instruct controller 61 to modify the parameters for subsequent NMES therapy sessions. For example, if the monitoring parameters reveal that the muscle mass has increased, indicative of muscle rehabilitation, or contractility has decreased, then the therapy dose may be automatically reduced some pre-determined amount as previously programmed by the physician.

In an alternative embodiment, muscle performance may be used to inhibit muscle contraction. For example, in certain types of low back pain, pain is caused by spasm of certain muscles in the back. Such spasm is accompanied by continuous increase in EMG activity. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, NMES stimulation may be used to inhibit muscle contraction by configuring the listening amplifier of circuitry module 68 to continuously or periodically measure EMG. If the EMG satisfies conditions indicating that muscle spasm has occurred, then NMES circuitry module is directed by controller 61 to apply stimulation to the nerve innervating the muscle in spasm to block conduction of signals from the nervous system which cause the muscle spasm, thereby preventing spasm. The stimulation provided by NMES circuitry module may be inhibited from time to time to allow circuitry module 68 to assess from the EMG signal if the muscle is still in spasm; if spasm has ceased, then application stimulation by NMES circuitry module 67 is terminated.

In an alternative embodiment, muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 68 may be configured to measure a combination of EMG and tissue impedance to confirm that a muscle is in spasm, thereby improving the safety and reliability of the measurement. Muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 68 also may be used to track changes in activity and health of the muscle in response to neural activity. In other words, the amount of muscle contraction as determined by impedance measurement of tissue volume may be correlated to the amount of electrical activity in the muscle as determined by EMG. Further still, the electrodes and muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 68 may be configured to record electrical signals from the nerves as well as the muscle, such that a measurement of the EMG (and/or tissue volume) in response to neural activity may be used as an indication of the health of the muscle.

Muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 68 also may employ measurement of the change in muscle mass in response to NMES of the nerve to adjust the electrical stimulation parameters. In this case, an empirically derived transfer function may be determined that relates electrical stimulation parameters, such as current, pulse width, frequency and duration, to the strength of contraction of the muscle. Over time, this transfer function may change, for example, as a result of electrode changes from movement or tissue ingrowth. Thus, the strength of muscle contraction may be used to automatically adjust the electrical parameters of the NMES stimulation provided by circuitry module 67 to achieve a desired muscle contraction.

Stimulator with RF Ablation Capability

Referring to FIG. 6, in accordance with another aspect of the present invention, an implantable RF ablation device is described. Although a primary application of the inventive technology is pain reduction in connection with improving stability of the spine, the inventive technology may be advantageously applied in other areas, for example:

-   -   RF rhizotomy, in which a sensory nerve is ablated to prevent         sensory signals (e.g., pain) from reaching the brain, such as         rhizotomy of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus in patients         with facet joint pain;     -   RF ablation of unresectable tumors located in the liver, brain,         musculoskeletal system, thyroid and parathyroid glands,         pancreas, kidney, lung, and breast, in which it is difficult to         achieve complete tumor necrosis, leading to recurrence of the         tumors and necessitating repeated RF ablation; and     -   Treatment of tumors in which the root of the tumor is located in         tissue that is considered too risky for surgical intervention,         such as tumors with roots in the digestive tract, uterine wall         or certain oesophageal tumors, and for which regular repeat         surgery is required to remove new growths.

The field of RF ablation is well developed, and parameters suitable for ablating nerve fibers and other tissues, such as RF energy, and attendant issues is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. See, e.g., Gazelle et al., “Tumor ablation with radio-frequency energy”, Radiology, December 2000: 217 (3): 633-46 and Haemerrich et al, “Thermal tumour ablation: devices, clinical applications and future directions”, Int. J. Hyperthermia, 2005 December; 21 (8):755-60. To the inventors' knowledge, however, no one has suggested an RF ablation device that is configured to be chronically implanted and capable of performing repeated RF ablation.

Referring now to FIG. 6, implantable device 70 is described, which is intended for chronic implantation to perform serial RF ablations in scenarios where it is necessary to repeat RF ablation of tissue in a particular region of the body after certain periods of time. The components of device 70 correspond closely to those described above with respect to the embodiment of FIG. 3, and includes controller 71, telemetry system 72 coupled to antenna 73, power supply 74, electrode switching array 75, system sensors 76, and terminal array 77. As in the preceding embodiments, electrode switching array 75 is selectably coupled to terminal array 77, which is coupled to the connector block 29 (see FIG. 2) that accepts one or more implantable electrode leads. Electrode switching array 75 also may include connection 77 a to the housing of device 70, so that the housing functions as an electrode. In accordance with this aspect of the present invention, device 70 further comprises RF ablation circuitry module 78, as further described below.

Each of components 71 to 77 operates in the manner described above for the embodiment of FIG. 3. Controller 71 preferably includes a programmable microprocessor, volatile memory, nonvolatile memory, and nonvolatile storage, and is coupled to and controls operation of telemetry system 72, electrode switching array 75 and RF ablation circuitry module 78. Power supply 74 powers the electrical components of device 70, and may comprise a primary cell or battery, a secondary cell or battery, a combination of both, or neither. In the latter case, power supply 74 may comprise or include a capacitor (such as a super capacitor of technology known to those skilled in the art) that stores energy transmitted through the skin via TETS. Device 70 may be programmed and/or controlled by, and may upload stored system and operational data to external control system 30 via telemetry system 72. System sensors 76 may comprise one or more sensors that monitor operation of device 70, as well as patient parameters, such as tissue impedance, and may log data relating to these parameters for later readout using the external control system.

In accordance with this aspect of the present invention, device 70 further comprises RF ablation circuitry module 78 coupled to controller, and designed to periodically ablate tissue or nerve fibers using RF energy. Accordingly, controller 71 may be configured to control operation of the telemetry system 72 to receive energy wirelessly from external control system 30 and store that energy in power supply 74, and may be configured to communicate the amplitude of received power back to the external control system via telemetry system 72 or via modulation of the impedance of the antenna 73. To ensure that RF ablation is only carried out at the direction of the external control system, device 70 may not include battery or capacitor, but instead may be arranged so that it is energized only when in communication with the external control system.

Expected energy requirements for the RF ablation circuitry module are in a range of about 1-40 watts, depending upon the intended application. TETS systems with this power capacity are well known to those skilled in the art and have been used, for example, with artificial hearts or Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs). However, the physical volume and other requirements of a high power TETS system may preclude its use in applications where the available surgical locations are limited. Thus, in an alternative embodiment, the TETS system may be of lower power capacity than the requirements of the RF generator, and device 70 may include an energy storage element, such as a super capacitor or low impedance secondary (rechargeable) cell, for powering RF ablation circuitry module 78. In use, the TETS may operate continuously, such that a signal is generated when there is adequate energy stored in the implantable device to deliver the RF ablation energy at the desired power and for the desired time. As an example, a TETS system capable of transferring 1 W may be used to supply RF energy delivery of 5 W with 20% duty cycle.

In this embodiment, telemetry system 72 enables communications between the external control system and device 70, allowing the implantable device to receive device and RF ablation operating parameters, as well as communicate logged information such as impedance between electrodes, temperature data and battery status to the external control system. Telemetry system 71 also may provide programming to controller 71 to reconfigure the operative electrodes through which ablation energy is supplied using electrode switching array 75, thereby allowing any electrode of a plurality of electrodes to be configured as a cathode, an anode or unconnected. The housing of device 70 also may be configured as an electrode via connection 77 a of terminal array 77. The foregoing capabilities provide flexibility in the location of ablation lesions and allow the physician to compensate for electrode movement after implantation.

System sensors 76 advantageously may be used to monitor the temperature of the tissue near the electrodes thru which energy for ablation is delivered. Typical tissue temperatures for RF ablation range from 50 C to 13 0C, depending on the type of tissue being ablated and the time allocated to the ablation. System sensors 76 may comprise, e.g., temperature sensors disposed within the device housing, or alternatively may measure the temperature of the connection to the electrode leads, and use that data to infer or predict the tissue temperature. Temperature sensors may also be incorporated into the leads and placed closer to the tissue targeted for ablation. System sensors 76 may be used in a passive (measuring) mode, or alternatively may comprise part of a feedback control system that continually or intermittently adjusts power delivered by the RF ablation circuitry module so that the temperature of the ablated tissue is maintained between desired limits for safety and efficacy.

Referring now to FIG. 7, an implantable stimulator illustratively incorporating all of the therapeutic circuitry modules described for the preceding embodiments is described. Implantable stimulator 80 corresponds to stimulator 20 of FIG. 1, and is programmed and controlled and/or powered by external control system 30. Stimulator 80 is intended for use, for example, in a stimulator that provides NMES stimulation, analgesic stimulation to block or reduce afferent pain signals in a nerve, and permits periodic nerve ablation (such as rhizotomy). Further in accordance with this aspect of the present invention, stimulator 80 includes muscle performance monitoring circuitry that supports testing of nerve fibers prior to rhizotomy, which to guide proper selection of the ablation electrodes.

Stimulator 80 of FIG. 7 includes controller 81, telemetry system 82 coupled to antenna 83, power supply 84, electrode switching array 85, system sensors 86, terminal array 87, NMES circuitry module 88, analgesic stimulation circuitry module 89, muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 90, and RF ablation circuitry module 91. As in the preceding embodiments, electrode switching array 85 is selectably coupled to terminal array 87 under the control of controller 81, and enables any one or more of the therapeutic circuitry modules of stimulator 80 to be selectably coupled to selected electrodes of one or more electrode leads. Electrode switching array 85 also may include connection 87 a to the housing of stimulator 80, so that the housing also may serve as an electrode.

Each of components 81 to 87 operates in the manner described above for the embodiment of FIG. 3. Controller 81 preferably includes a programmable microprocessor, volatile memory, nonvolatile memory, and nonvolatile storage, and is coupled to and controls operation of telemetry system 82, electrode switching array 85, NMES circuitry module 88, analgesic stimulation circuitry module 89, muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 90, and RF ablation circuitry module 91. Power supply 84 powers the electrical components of implantable stimulator 80, and may comprise a primary cell or battery, a secondary cell or battery, a combination of both, or neither, as discussed above. Stimulator 80 may be programmed and/or controlled by, and may upload stored system and operational data to external control system 30 via telemetry system 82. System sensors 86 may comprise one or more sensors that monitor operation of stimulator 80, as well as various patient parameters as discussed above.

In accordance with this aspect of the present invention, stimulator 80 further comprises NMES circuitry module 88 and analgesic stimulation circuitry module 89, as described above with respect to the embodiment of FIG. 4, muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 90 as described above with respect to the embodiment of FIG. 5, and RF ablation circuitry module 91 as described above with respect to the embodiment of FIG. 6. In this manner, a patient in need of spinal muscle rehabilitation and restoration of neural drive may have the full range of therapeutic modalities available. In particular, stimulator 80 as initially implanted by the physician, may be programmed to provide NMES stimulation and stimulation to block pain signals in afferent nerves. As muscle strength and contractility improve over the course of the therapy, the muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 90 may measure the progress of the therapy and adjust the NMES stimulation parameters or circumvent spasm. In addition, depending upon the patient's reported condition and measurement data provided by the muscle performance monitoring circuitry module 90, the physician may periodically activate RF ablation circuitry module 91 to denervate selected nerve fibers.

Electrode Lead Systems

In view of the capabilities of the various implantable stimulators described herein, it may be advantageous to provide an electrode lead specially configured for use with such stimulators. Referring to FIGS. 8A and 8B, electrode leads configured to provide NMES stimulation to a nerve to cause muscle contraction; to stimulate a nerve to inhibit pain signals from propagating to the brain; to stimulate a nerve to inhibit motor nerve signals thereby reducing or stopping contraction of a muscle (e.g., in spasm); to record electrical signals such as electromyography or tissue impedance; or for performing in situ RF ablation are now described.

With respect to FIG. 8A, electrode lead 100 carrying electrodes 101 a to 101 f is described. The number of electrodes may be as few as 1 and as many as may be realistically placed within the target anatomical space. Electrode configurations commonly used in the art include 1 (for unipolar stimulation), 2, 4 (peripheral nerve stimulation), 8, 16 (spinal cord stimulators) or up to 22 electrodes (cochlear implants). For the purpose of this disclosure, distal-most electrode 101 a will be referred to as electrode #1, electrode 101 b will be electrode #2 and so on moving proximally along lead 100 up to the total number of electrodes.

When employed with an implantable stimulator as described herein that provides multiple independent current outputs, electrode lead 100 is capable of delivering multiple therapies simultaneously, in an overlaid fashion or staggered. Electrodes 101 a to 101 f may be sized and positioned relative to each other to allow for generation of a voltage field tailored to the specific type of stimulation, sensing or ablation desired for the given therapies.

In one embodiment, electrode lead 100 is placed parallel to a target nerve in a caudal to cranial orientation (with the cranial direction being the direction tending towards afferent neural activity). Then so positioned, electrodes 1 and 2, which are most cranial, may be sized and spaced to allow for optimal blocking of afferent pain signals being transmitted along the nerve (for example the pain signals being carried from the facet joint along the medial branch). More caudally, electrodes 3 and 4 may be sized and spaced to allow for optimal recruitment of large fiber motor neurons. Because the action potentials required for activation of a muscle travel efferently, these potentials are not blocked by the more cranial blocking action of electrodes 1 and 2. Finally, electrodes 5 and 6, placed most caudally, may be sized and positioned for sensing and recording of muscle recruitment through capturing the EMG signal of the muscle, which may be processed, for example, by the muscle performance monitoring circuitry module as described above with respect to the embodiment of FIG. 4. Such an arrangement therefore allows for simultaneous blocking of pain arising from the facet joint, stimulation of the motor fibers of the nerve eliciting muscle contraction, and sensing of the elicited response (which would enable a closed loop system, improving device longevity and recruitment efficiency) without any of the stimulation pulses negatively impacting the performance of the others.

With respect to FIG. 8B, alternative electrode lead 110 carrying electrodes 111 a to 111 g is described. Distal-most electrode 111 a again will be referred to as electrode #1, electrode 111 b will be electrode #2 and so on moving proximally along lead 111. In the embodiment of FIG. 8B, a blocking action of electrodes 1 and 2 may be used to mute the sensory perception of stimulation. In this manner, NMES stimulation therapy of the motor fibers in patients may be achieved where the patients would otherwise not tolerate the stimulation because of the resulting bi-directional action potential generated by neural stimulation. It also may be possible to use electrodes 5 and 6, which will likely be placed intramuscularly, to record the volume EMG signal in the muscle. Changes in this signal over time may provide an indication of the degree to which motor control has been compromised due to injury. When such data are compared over time during the period after a therapy regime has been completed, the data may be used as a positive indicator that additional therapy may be required to maintain spinal stability.

While various illustrative embodiments of the invention are described above, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention. The appended claims are intended to cover all such changes and modifications that fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention. 

What is claimed:
 1. A system for rehabilitating or aiding rehabilitation of spinal stability, the system comprising: at least one electrode lead comprising at least one electrode, the at least one electrode lead configured to be implanted in or adjacent to tissue associated with at least one muscle supporting stability of a spine; one or more sensors configured to measure one or more parameters of muscle performance; and a stimulator operatively coupled to the at least one electrode lead and the one or more sensors, the stimulator configured to: deliver electrical stimulation to the tissue via the at least one electrode in accordance with programmed parameters to cause the at least one muscle supporting stability of the spine to contract; monitor one or more parameters of muscle performance via the one or more sensors to generate an output; and automatically adjust the programmed parameters responsive to the output.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the stimulator is configured to monitor one of the one or more parameters of muscle performance by monitoring an evoked potential.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the stimulator is configured to monitor one of the one or more parameters of muscle performance by electromyography.
 4. The system of claim 1, further comprising a controller operatively coupled to or a part of the stimulator, the controller configured to diagnose a degree of spinal instability based on the output of the one or more sensors.
 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the controller is further configured to diagnose a change of spinal instability during a course of a therapy.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the stimulator is configured to monitor one of the one or more parameters of muscle performance by monitoring tissue impedance.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the stimulator is configured to monitor one of the one or more parameters of muscle performance by monitoring mechanical motion.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the stimulator is configured to monitor one of the one or more parameters of muscle performance by monitoring electrical parameters of tissue associated with the at least one muscle supporting stability of the spine.
 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the stimulator is configured to monitor one of the one or more parameters of muscle performance by monitoring muscle contraction induced for the at least one muscle supporting stability of the spine.
 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the stimulator is configured to continuously monitor the one or more parameters of muscle performance via the one or more sensors.
 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the stimulator is configured to periodically monitor the one or more parameters of muscle performance via the one or more sensors.
 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the stimulator comprises a first circuitry module operatively coupled to the at least one electrode lead, the first circuitry module configured to deliver the electrical stimulation to the tissue via the at least one electrode in accordance with the programmed parameters to cause the at least one muscle supporting stability of the spine to contract.
 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the stimulator comprises a second circuitry module operatively coupled to the one or more sensors to generate the output.
 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the second circuitry module is further configured to automatically adjust the programmed parameters responsive to the output.
 15. The system of claim 1, wherein the stimulator is configured to automatically adjust the programmed parameters responsive to detected changes in muscle performance.
 16. The system of claim 15, wherein the stimulator is configured to automatically adjust the programmed parameters when a detected change in muscle performance falls outside a predetermined threshold.
 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the detected change in muscle performance is indicative of muscle rehabilitation, and wherein the stimulator is configured to automatically adjust the programmed parameters by a predetermined amount responsive to the muscle rehabilitation.
 18. The system of claim 16, wherein the detected change in muscle performance is indicative of decreased muscle contractility, and wherein the stimulator is configured to automatically adjust the programmed parameters by a predetermined amount responsive to the decreased muscle contractility.
 19. The system of claim 16, wherein the detected change in muscle performance is indicative of increased muscle contractility, and wherein the stimulator is configured to automatically adjust the programmed parameters by a predetermined amount responsive to the increased muscle contractility.
 20. The system of claim 16, wherein the detected change in muscle performance is indicative that additional therapy is required.
 21. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one electrode is configured to be implanted in or adjacent to a dorsal ramus nerve innervating a multifidus muscle supporting stability of the spine, and wherein the stimulator is configured to deliver electrical stimulation to the dorsal ramus nerve via the at least one electrode to cause the multifidus muscle to contract, and the one or more sensors are configured to monitor contraction of the multifidus muscle.
 22. A method for rehabilitating or aiding rehabilitation of spinal stability, the method comprising: delivering electrical stimulation to tissue associated with at least one muscle supporting stability of a spine via an electrode lead comprising at least one electrode in accordance with programmed parameters to cause the at least one muscle supporting stability of the spine to contract; monitoring one or more parameters of muscle performance via one or more sensors; generating an output based on the one or more parameters of muscle performance; and automatically adjusting the programmed parameters responsive to the output.
 23. The method of claim 22, wherein monitoring the one or more parameters of muscle performance via the one or more sensors comprises monitoring the one or more parameters of muscle performance via the one or more sensors continuously or periodically.
 24. The method of claim 22, wherein monitoring the one or more parameters of muscle performance via the one or more sensors comprises monitoring electrical parameters of tissue associated with the at least one muscle supporting stability of the spine.
 25. The method of claim 22, wherein monitoring the one or more parameters of muscle performance via the one or more sensors comprises monitoring muscle contraction induced for the at least one muscle supporting stability of the spine.
 26. The method of claim 22, wherein automatically adjusting the programmed parameters responsive to the output comprises automatically adjusting the programmed parameters responsive to detected changes in muscle performance.
 27. The method of claim 26, wherein automatically adjusting the programmed parameters responsive to detected changes in muscle performance comprises automatically adjusting the programmed parameters when a detected change in muscle performance falls outside a predetermined threshold.
 28. The method of claim 27, wherein the detected change in muscle performance is indicative of muscle rehabilitation, and wherein automatically adjusting the programmed parameters responsive to detected changes in muscle performance comprises automatically adjusting the programmed parameters responsive to the muscle rehabilitation.
 29. The method of claim 27, wherein the detected change in muscle performance is indicative of decreased muscle contractility, and wherein automatically adjusting the programmed parameters responsive to detected changes in muscle performance comprises automatically adjusting the programmed parameters responsive to the decreased muscle contractility.
 30. The method of claim 27, wherein the detected change in muscle performance is indicative of increased muscle contractility, and wherein automatically adjusting the programmed parameters responsive to detected changes in muscle performance comprises automatically adjusting the programmed parameters responsive to the increased muscle contractility. 